[postlink]http://tubehd.blogspot.com/2009/12/sanyo-fh1-vs-canon-eos-5d-mkii.html[/postlink]
[starttext]
Sanyo FH1 vs. Canon EOS 5D mkII High Definition video
Comparison of Sanyo FH1 ( captured in 60fps 1080p with and without Raynox wide angle adapter QC-505 ) and Canon 5D mkII with Sigma lens ( 24 - 70 mm f.l. ) on a cloudy day. Conclusion: Sanyo has quite much worse resolution. Yes, the resolution is the same, but compression is much higher ( bitrate is app.12 Mbps vs. 40Mbps in 30fps) so it looks even like 720p in comparison. But when I use Vdub sharpen filter, it's much better. As you can see the dynamic range of Canon is in different league. BUT, the FH1 is camcoder... so you can zoom without shaking and focus much faster and reliably. So I think that Sanyo has naturally worse picture quality but has 60fps, so moving object looks more live alike than Canon's ( not too much fast because of codec picture boxing thanks low bitrate ) and you can slow down everything to 43 % of original file (24fps). There are lot of differences (depth of field etc. ) but after all.... Sanyo is ten times cheaper and size is maybe quater of Canon and if you have just HD ready TV you don't recognize the difference. But there the same problem with youtube (30fps?,720p)... you don't recognize fluency of Sanyo and probably also worse picture quality... I can try upload raw unedited files, if somebody will want it... Uploaded in 1080p 60fps. BTW. video was edited in Sony Vegas 9.0c and compressed by Xvid codec ( quant. 3) in Vdub thanks to DebugFrame server...
[endtext]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtukAJKmYYQendofvidzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Sanyo FH1 vs. Canon EOS 5D mkII High Definition video
Comparison of Sanyo FH1 ( captured in 60fps 1080p with and without Raynox wide angle adapter QC-505 ) and Canon 5D mkII with Sigma lens ( 24 - 70 mm f.l. ) on a cloudy day. Conclusion: Sanyo has quite much worse resolution. Yes, the resolution is the same, but compression is much higher ( bitrate is app.12 Mbps vs. 40Mbps in 30fps) so it looks even like 720p in comparison. But when I use Vdub sharpen filter, it's much better. As you can see the dynamic range of Canon is in different league. BUT, the FH1 is camcoder... so you can zoom without shaking and focus much faster and reliably. So I think that Sanyo has naturally worse picture quality but has 60fps, so moving object looks more live alike than Canon's ( not too much fast because of codec picture boxing thanks low bitrate ) and you can slow down everything to 43 % of original file (24fps). There are lot of differences (depth of field etc. ) but after all.... Sanyo is ten times cheaper and size is maybe quater of Canon and if you have just HD ready TV you don't recognize the difference. But there the same problem with youtube (30fps?,720p)... you don't recognize fluency of Sanyo and probably also worse picture quality... I can try upload raw unedited files, if somebody will want it... Uploaded in 1080p 60fps. BTW. video was edited in Sony Vegas 9.0c and compressed by Xvid codec ( quant. 3) in Vdub thanks to DebugFrame server...
[endtext]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtukAJKmYYQendofvidzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
No comments:
Post a Comment